Black Belt/Candidate Presentations and Black Belt Ceremony
With the changes we have implemented this year to the black belt grading process, the one thing that I am concerned about is how to give the candidates the same sense of accomplishment provided by a twelve hour grading process that we controlled, as the new process where the candidates have all the control and responsibility. I have spent the past couple of months considering how to give the upcoming scheduled Black Belt Demo Day on December 2nd a sense of ritual and ceremony for the candidates.
Max and Eva will remember the black belt grading that we had tried experimenting with a twice a year grading cycle so that people who failed to pass did not have to wait a full year to try again. The people who graded in the spring had to wait until the following February to get promoted during the banquet. They felt a big disconnect between their grading and their promotion. What I am concerned about with our new process is that there will be a disconnect between their I Ho Chuan year of development and the results of a forty-five minute demonstration.
A solution to this problem can be found in combining the candidates’ demonstration day with the black belt ceremony. By finishing their demonstration day with the black belt ceremony, we will be providing ritual and ceremony to highlight the scope of their accomplishments.
Candidate Demonstration and Black Belt Ceremony 2024
We push the planned demonstration day for the candidates from December 2nd, 2023 to January 6, 2024.
The black belts looking to be promoted to higher degrees will perform their presentations in front of the Master Instructors at 2:30 pm. *
The black belt candidates will perform their presentations in front of the entire grading board at 3:30pm. *
The black belt ceremony with all the black belts will begin at 5pm. **
* Only ‘qualified’ black belts and candidates will be allowed to present as determined by their IHC process.
** Only candidates who have successfully ‘passed’ their grading will take part in the ceremony.
Future presentations/ceremonies will run at different times, depending upon how many candidates will be performing that year.
This format will also see the duties of the grading board evolve to reflect the weight being put on the I Ho Chuan process. My vision is that the grading board will stay intact as it is with the board members monitoring the candidates (both 1st degree brown belts and black belts) and submitting quarterly assessments so that the candidates are getting real-time feedback as their year progresses. Any board member who is part of the I Ho Chuan team AND seeking higher promotion will recuse themselves from the grading board for that year so that they are solely focused on their own development and grading.
Black Belt Grading Evolution
In light of how ill-prepared candidates tend to be when it comes to their actual grading, it is obvious that our current method is not working.
Our current method is built around the I Ho Chuan process. The idea is for the candidates to faithfully use the process consistently throughout the year to evolve into well-prepared black belts who are able to adequately challenge the black belt grading day.
Since its inception in 2011/2012 as a mirror to the Ultimate Black Belt Test, the IHC process has not fulfilled its promise. While the process has been proven to work, only two people have ever followed it to the letter. Both those people found the actual grading day to be easily managed and both passed the grading with flying colours.
The I Ho Chuan is expected to be the main tool for our candidates to achieve black belt status, but it is not the only tool or the only way. The idea was for the majority of candidates to use the IHC process while a few outliers may find another path. The problem that exists today is that out of all the candidates in the past 10 years, only two have actually used the IHC process to achieve their goal while the rest have been the outliers trying to achieve black belt through other means and strategies.
With these irrefutable historical facts in front of us, I feel that the time is ripe for us to make decisive changes that address these known issues as opposed to adding even more tools to the process. I believe that by eliminating most of our current tools and funneling the candidates deeper into the IHC environment, we will reverse the trend from the IHC process users being the outliers of the grading process. We have had 100% success with the candidates who have focused on the IHC process so I have no reason to believe we need any other tools for the candidates to prepare for their black belt.
PROPOSED PROCESS
Consistently frame the IHC process as the actual Black Belt Grading and eliminate grading day in its current form. This will force ALL candidates to embrace the process and cease counting on last minute changes and the grading day itself to pull their efforts out of the fire.
Quantify the candidates’ grading year by establishing a grading scale that takes into account four main categories:
Forms - grades based upon what we are seeing in class and seminar opportunities
Fitness - grades based upon three fitness tests conducted throughout the year during their in person classes or other seminars and events.
IHC Requirements - grades based upon their consistent fulfillment of their IHC commitments.
Engagement - grades based upon their overall attendance record in their core classes, their teaching commitments, and their participation in SRKF school events and activities.
We are already mostly there. We have eliminated the syllabus and fitness requirements from the students’ eyes and we have simplified the syllabus (forms-wise) to help the students narrow their focus on what is most important. We now need to eliminate the grading day in its current form and transition it to a shorter day where they have qualified to attend based upon achieving a minimum grade in the four main categories. I believe grading day can be reduced to only the personal demo that can include their five applications and four board breaks.
The idea of this new process will be to instill a sustainable training discipline within the candidates that will ensure their adequate skill and effort at the end of the year-long process. The grading day will provide the final sense of accomplishment within the candidates without giving them an alternate path around the IHC process.
If we can establish a real-time grade for each candidate, there will be a constant reminder for them to stay engaged with their IHC requirements and empower them to make the adjustments necessary to qualify to present their demo on grading day.
Black Belt Grading Process 2022
After decades of adjusting and amending our grading process to improve student outcomes, we find ourselves continually struggling to solidify a process that addresses all the problems and roadblocks being experienced by our black belt candidates.
We all are in agreement that the biggest issue our candidates face is mental, not physical. They tend to intellectualize their training and consistently fail to take physical action with their intellectual breakthroughs. As their teachers we can tell them where they are lacking but we have no control on how they ultimately go about addressing our feedback.
An ideal process acknowledges and embraces certain absolutes and values:
Not everyone is able to earn a black belt.
We (teachers) tend to be too involved.
Our grading process should provide bread crumbs to help the candidates find their way. It should not be providing stepping stones.
A candidate should always question their skill, never their effort.
Our students tend to channel their focus to serve the grading process as opposed to pursuing mastery.
There is a black belt standard and that standard is absolute for each individual. It is about each candidate's effort, not just their skill. When we say effort, we are talking about more than just their blood and tears. We're also talking about the sustainable process they use to achieve mastery. This defines their standard:
Ideal - 60% test result after 100% effort.
Not ideal - 90% test result after 60% effort.
Mastery of the curriculum - not just the syllabus.
Moving forward, we have agreed upon an approach to address historical challenges while reinforcing the ideal of mastery over mindless training to pass a test within our students
We will eliminate student access to the CPRS fitness document so that, ideally, a candidate's first exposure to the specifics of the fitness test would be their grading day.
We will remove absolutes for the students. All quantification of their progress will be only for the Board, not the candidates.
The I Ho Chuan year will be the main tool the Board will use to decide Pass/Fail.
The grading day will be the main tool the Board will use to convince the candidates that they earned their promotion or that they did not earn it.
Rather than always seeking to modify our grading process to improve outcomes, we will leave the process alone and focus on modifying our teaching to reinvest in the tools we already have at our disposal by improving their efficacy:
Bring three main focuses into every class:
Warmup
Skill drills with intensity
Main lessons/meat
Continually focus on curriculum in our teachings and redirect and encourage our students to do the same in their learning. Remember - we have a curricular standard, not a syllabus standard.
Jeff Brinker